bicycle helmets review image
haylee
Iam 13 am I required by law in new york state to wear a helmet when riding a bike?
Answer
Haylee
It appears to be various ages depending on where your ride. Here is a list of states so that you can review it. Just scroll down to NY.
http://www.helmets.org/mandator.htm
occerref
Haylee
It appears to be various ages depending on where your ride. Here is a list of states so that you can review it. Just scroll down to NY.
http://www.helmets.org/mandator.htm
occerref
What's the difference between populism, democracy, utilitarianism, realism and pragmatism?
Recession
Aren't they all based on
"agreement" "majority" "whatever works"?
Answer
This is a very loaded question. Entire books have been written on these things. But they're not based on the same thing.
Populism: any group's or party's attempt to appear to be, consist of, or speak on behalf of "the people" -- a deliberately ambiguous term designed in a horoscope-like manner so that it ostensibly includes everybody. Populism happens, for example, when a multi-millionaire politician is shown snowboarding, riding a bicycle, or speaking to an auto-workers union while wearing bluejeans and a construction helmet.
Utilitarianism: "good" defined as the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people . . . but who decides what the "majority" is? White people? The "middle class"? See Jeremy Bentham or John Stuart Mill. The minority is expected to sit back and take it on this one. It is a slightly more "honest" and less pandering approach than populism.
Democracy: rule by citizens. None of this "representation" and Electoral College stuff. Most people agree that, in a State as large as the US, democracy is too "inefficient." That is exactly why many people think the US is too big, including many who did not want the Constitution to begin with (i.e. Patrick Henry).
Pragmatism: in US history, this has more to do with judicial procedure that population numbers. Rather than relying on precedence, the courts would assess how a modern context affects the situation and the ruling; whatever precedence might exist could be out-of-date and would no longer apply. American conservatism would probably call this "judicial activism," but that is unfair. It is merely another type of Judicial Review practiced since Judge Marshall in the early 1800s.
Realism: I'm not totally sure what you mean by this one. But I think it has a condescending tone; it pretends as if there is only one perspective or "reality." Conservatism always has the benefit of appearing to be "realistic," because it is inherently status quo; but that does not mean that conservatism is always correct, fair, just, or whatever. "Realism" give the illusion that it is somehow outside of or beyond ideology or agendas.
This is a very loaded question. Entire books have been written on these things. But they're not based on the same thing.
Populism: any group's or party's attempt to appear to be, consist of, or speak on behalf of "the people" -- a deliberately ambiguous term designed in a horoscope-like manner so that it ostensibly includes everybody. Populism happens, for example, when a multi-millionaire politician is shown snowboarding, riding a bicycle, or speaking to an auto-workers union while wearing bluejeans and a construction helmet.
Utilitarianism: "good" defined as the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people . . . but who decides what the "majority" is? White people? The "middle class"? See Jeremy Bentham or John Stuart Mill. The minority is expected to sit back and take it on this one. It is a slightly more "honest" and less pandering approach than populism.
Democracy: rule by citizens. None of this "representation" and Electoral College stuff. Most people agree that, in a State as large as the US, democracy is too "inefficient." That is exactly why many people think the US is too big, including many who did not want the Constitution to begin with (i.e. Patrick Henry).
Pragmatism: in US history, this has more to do with judicial procedure that population numbers. Rather than relying on precedence, the courts would assess how a modern context affects the situation and the ruling; whatever precedence might exist could be out-of-date and would no longer apply. American conservatism would probably call this "judicial activism," but that is unfair. It is merely another type of Judicial Review practiced since Judge Marshall in the early 1800s.
Realism: I'm not totally sure what you mean by this one. But I think it has a condescending tone; it pretends as if there is only one perspective or "reality." Conservatism always has the benefit of appearing to be "realistic," because it is inherently status quo; but that does not mean that conservatism is always correct, fair, just, or whatever. "Realism" give the illusion that it is somehow outside of or beyond ideology or agendas.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: In new york state,how old do you have to be to be allowed to ride a bicycle without a helmet legally?
Rating: 100% based on 9998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 100% based on 9998 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar